Three female students sat on a bench in The Courtauld Gallery Blavatnik Fine Rooms, discussing an artwork out of shot.

My Favourite Painting at The Courtauld Gallery – by students at The Courtauld

8 Apr 2025

With centuries of art history at our fingertips, it’s often hard to choose just one favourite artwork. But that’s exactly the challenge we set to students at The Courtauld – what is your favourite work of art on display at The Courtauld Gallery, and why?

Hear their responses and see some of our most-loved works in a new light.

Female Nude (c.1916) by Amadeo Modigliani

Georgios Batzanopoulos, BA History of Art student

When the Female Nude by Amadeo Modigliani was first presented in Paris in 1916, it was met with fierce reactions because of its obscenity. The familiarity of today’s society with the nude body and erotic imagery allows us to view Modigliani’s work without being disturbed by its original controversiality.

A portrait of a nude female by artist Amedeo Modigliani
Amedeo Modigliani (1884-1920), Female Nude, circa 1916, The Courtauld, London (Samuel Courtauld Trust) © The Courtauld 

What is captivating in this painting is the contrast between its appearance and its aura. The subject is seemingly erotic — a naked, idealised young woman, portrayed at the peak of her beauty, with her body directed towards the viewer, thus exposing all of her erogenous zones. However, the woman’s expression transmits a deeply serene aura which veils her seductive appearance. I have attempted numerous times to treat this painting erotically, but it almost feels sacrilegious. While the woman is naked, she gives the impression of being entirely clothed. The interaction with the Female Nude is very similar to that of an icon of the Virgin Mary, specifically the Virgin of Tenderness. It invites a worship-like experience, where the viewer feels obliged to approach the Ur-female with respect and piety. Yet, it creates a personal and intimate relationship with the viewer, accompanying him even after leaving the gallery.

In a Private Dining Room at the Rat Mort (c.1899) by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec

Laura Tomsova, BA History of Art student

My favourite work in the Courtauld collection is In a Private Dining Room at the Rat Mort (c.1899) by Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec. I first fell in love with art history because of Toulouse-Lautrec’s vivid scenes of nightlife in late 19th-century Paris, and this painting continues to fascinate me.

Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864 - 1901), In a Private Dining Room (At the Rat Mort),
Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec (1864 - 1901), In a Private Dining Room (At the Rat Mort), 1899. Oil on canvas, The Courtauld, London (Samuel Courtauld Trust) © The Courtauld

At the heart of the painting is Lucy Jourdain, a cocotte—a term used at the time for a high-class prostitute. Like Lautrec himself, Lucy existed on the margins of polite society. She looks directly out at us with warmth, creating a sense that we’re sharing a private moment or perhaps an inside joke. But something unusual catches the eye: Lucy’s hood closely resembles the shape of the pear resting quietly beside her in a fruit bowl. Lautrec seems to suggest a subtle connection—Lucy, like the pear, appears passive and waiting, an object ready to be chosen by those around her. Through this visual metaphor, Lautrec skilfully draws attention to Lucy’s complex position in society—admired yet objectified, surrounded by people but isolated.

Even more striking is Lautrec’s decision to crop out the face of the man sitting next to Lucy. By removing his identity, Lautrec shifts our full attention onto her. She becomes more than an accessory; she is the dignified centrepiece of the composition. The scene’s strange greenish glow evokes the dizzying, dreamlike atmosphere of a late-night café—filled with alcohol, cigarette smoke, and blurred senses. Lautrec’s rapid, loose brushstrokes make the painting feel intimate yet fleeting, as if we’re glimpsing a brief, smoky moment.

Created during a difficult period in Lautrec’s life, marked by illness and addiction, the painting goes beyond simply showing a nightlife scene. It explores deeper human emotions—loneliness, connection, and vulnerability. For me, this powerful work encourages us to look beyond surface glamour, urging us to consider the emotional truths beneath.

Landscape by Moonlight (1635) by Peter Paul Rubens

Yoyo Hou, BA History of Art student

Rubens’ Landscape by Moonlight has always held a special place in my heart. When I first visited the gallery before I joined Courtauld as a student, I expected to be drawn mainly to the Impressionists.  However, this 17th-century landscape painting captivated me by its quiet, dreamlike beauty.

Painting of landscape
Peter Paul Rubens (1577 -1640) Landscape by Moonlight, 1635–40, The Courtauld, London (Samuel Courtauld Trust) © The Courtauld 

Despite its small size, everything is so cleverly done: tiny sparkles of yellow paint indicate the twinkling stars, enlivening the darkness of the night. I am particularly drawn to the layering of dry brushstrokes Rubens used to depict the sky, which creates a beautiful harmony between the soft radiance of the moon and the dark blue sky. It is a work that one could stand in front of and gaze for hours, with every look discovering a new detail hidden in the scene.

Citations